Post by Moderator on Nov 9, 2003 12:39:15 GMT -5
From: anita22179 Sent: 7/2/2003 1:06 PM
hi fawn,
i read your post abt importance of massage and found it really very interesting. i had sent a post but i cant find it anywhere now. anyway, i'll ask my questions again, how long do you think massage is required daily. i have been adding progesterone to my 2400 mg of BO on days 21-24, but if i havent got it wrong, i read in your post that some women grow more in the luteal phases as they have more glandular tissue than fat, these women are those who are below 25 , have never been pregnant and all and you know what i fit that bill exactly, i am 24, never been pregnant and i have very little fat on breasts.when i had done a blood test in luteal phase of my cycle, i found i was in low normal range in oestrogen but my progesterone was very very low, like that of follicular phase, which has made me oestrogen dominant all my life in spite of low levels of both hormones and i have never grown more than an A cup, as a teenage i also showed all signs of prog. deficiency like loss of hair, excess body hair , long cycles PMS etc.
could it mean that these women would do better by adding more progesterone apart from using BO and the massage unlike older women in wich case excess progesterone could stop or slow down growth? also i was wondering that maybe the younger women with more glandular tissue are the ones who can benefit more by using mammary glandular? is there any risk involved with mammary glandulars? you mentioned you used to take it, what doses did you take and what brand?
one last question, how do you know if you need pregnenolone? whats its role in BE?
sorry to be bothering you so much with my thinktank !!
anita
hi fawn,
i read your post abt importance of massage and found it really very interesting. i had sent a post but i cant find it anywhere now. anyway, i'll ask my questions again, how long do you think massage is required daily. i have been adding progesterone to my 2400 mg of BO on days 21-24, but if i havent got it wrong, i read in your post that some women grow more in the luteal phases as they have more glandular tissue than fat, these women are those who are below 25 , have never been pregnant and all and you know what i fit that bill exactly, i am 24, never been pregnant and i have very little fat on breasts.when i had done a blood test in luteal phase of my cycle, i found i was in low normal range in oestrogen but my progesterone was very very low, like that of follicular phase, which has made me oestrogen dominant all my life in spite of low levels of both hormones and i have never grown more than an A cup, as a teenage i also showed all signs of prog. deficiency like loss of hair, excess body hair , long cycles PMS etc.
could it mean that these women would do better by adding more progesterone apart from using BO and the massage unlike older women in wich case excess progesterone could stop or slow down growth? also i was wondering that maybe the younger women with more glandular tissue are the ones who can benefit more by using mammary glandular? is there any risk involved with mammary glandulars? you mentioned you used to take it, what doses did you take and what brand?
one last question, how do you know if you need pregnenolone? whats its role in BE?
sorry to be bothering you so much with my thinktank !!
anita